Abbiamo già esposto ai nostri lettori i problemi etici e biologici che pone la creazione di un embrione col dna di un padre e due madri.
Il lettori sanno che comunque la sperimentazione sugli embrioni comporta la creazione in laboratorio e la soppressione di vite umane innocenti, a onta della dignità della persona e dei suoi diritti inviolabili, tanto sbandierati – rivisitati e corretti – dai politically correct.
Ora Life Site News ci informa che il Parlamento inglese, sta per approvare una legge che consente alla madre che fornisce il mitocondrio e “solo” lo 0,1% del dna, di rimanere anonima.
Ciò pone delle questioni di ordine legale, in quanto contraddice la legge inglese sulla fecondazione artificiale che consente ai figli concepiti in vitro di conoscere l’identità dei genitori biologici dopo che avranno compiuto 18 anni.
Da un punto di vista etico, dato che la percentuale di dna appartenente alla madre mitocondriale è piccola, ma non irrilevante, molti bioeticisti contestano questa prospettiva legislativa.
Da un punto di vista embriologico, molti scienziati ribadiscono quanto sia rischiosa la procedura, che è stata testata in modo insufficiente sugli animali, e non si sa bene come risulteranno gli embrioni così prodotti.
Tanto se “vengono male” li buttano…
Redazione
L'articolo di Life Site:
British Government Will Keep Third Parent in Three-Parent-Embryo IVF a Secret
by Sarah Zagorski | London, England | LifeNews.com | 12/19/14 11:40 AM
The British government is considering using a new technique to eradicate serious illness stemming from one parent. However, there’s a catch— the child will have two mothers and one father.
As LifeNews previously reported, the technique involves the removal of the egg cell’s nucleus and replaced with the nucleus of a woman with mitochondrial disease.
threeparent3Then the genetically-engineered egg is fertilized with sperm creating an embryo that has genetic material from three persons, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from the donor, and nuclear DNA contributed by the parents. If accepted, Britain would be the first country in the world to allow the creation of babies that have three parents.
Now the British government is arguing that since the third mother will only contribute to 0.1% of the child’s DNA, their identity should remain secret. Currently, the law allows children born via IVF to find out their donor’s identity when they turn 18; however, this would not be the case with three-parent IVF.
Although some believe this will give families suffering from illness the ability to have healthy children, there are serious problems with this technique. First, the science behind this is very new and animal testing of MD has been limited. In other words, no one really knows how safe it will be. Secondly, is it wrong to create multiple babies to only discard— I mean kill a few, which always happens with pronuclear transfer (the process of swapping DNA between two fertilized human eggs).
And finally, many pro-lifers have serious concerns with the morality of making genetically engineered children. This is not just because it involves the destruction of human life, but because in order to perfect these children there will be experimentation. Ultimately, human life will be used in science experiments and mistakes will be made that we cannot take back.
The Daily Mail shares more about the controversy surrounding three-parent IVF:
Supporters say the legislation would allow those living in the shadow of incurable disease the chance to have a healthy child.
Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
But critics argue that genetically engineering eggs crosses a critical ethical line, and are concerned about the impact of children not knowing who their third parent is.
‘This is already granted to children who are adopted because we understand how important it is for children to know about their genetic heritage for their sense of identity and self-understanding. It should not be denied to these children.’
However Robert Meadowcroft, of the Muscular Dystrophy Campaign, said the technique ‘involves a calculated step into new scientific territory, but it is a very focused step, with the sole aim of preventing a potentially fatal condition from being passed down where possible.’
He added that it would open up the ‘possibility of motherhood’ to women afraid of passing on a painful and debilitating condition.The technique, being perfected at Newcastle University, involves trying to prevent disease caused by faults in mitochondria, which cause serious illness in one in 6,500 babies.
Scientists have found a way of swapping the mother-to-be’s diseased mitochondria with healthy ones donated by another woman.
The technique involves removing the nucleus DNA from a fertilised egg, and inserting it into a donor egg where the nucleus DNA has been removed.
The resulting embryo would end up with the nucleus DNA from its parents – making up the vast majority – but the mitochondrial DNA from the donor, amounting to around 0.1 per cent.
The proposed change in the law was announced by Public Health Minister Jane Ellison. It will have to be debated and voted on in both Houses but could be passed by the end of January. However, it would not become law until October. The Newcastle team say they are delighted that Parliament is to consider the legislation and say they will soon be ready to treat couples.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento